With al-Mutanabbi by Taha Hussein
Publication history: First published in 1937; republished by the Hindawi Foundation in 2013.
Writing context: The book was written during Taha Hussein’s stay in the French Alps in 1936, where he dictated its chapters over the course of just six weeks.
Methodology: Hussein relied on historical and psychological analysis, deliberately avoiding traditional biographical accounts. He used al-Mutanabbi’s collected poems as his primary source.
Purpose: To uncover the secret behind the enduring admiration for al-Mutanabbi despite his flaws, and to explore the role of the intellectual in confronting political corruption.
Key stages in al-Mutanabbi’s life (as analyzed by Taha Hussein)
Unusual childhood:
Escape to the desert:
Patronage under princes:
The era of Sayf al-Dawla al-Hamadani (his creative peak):
Yet Hussein criticized al-Mutanabbi for what he called “trading in poetry”—using his talent to gain wealth and gifts, betraying the higher purpose of literature as a tool for social reform.
The Kafur al-Ikhshidi period (moral crisis):
Tragic end:
Taha Hussein’s analysis of al-Mutanabbi’s character
Human contradiction:
-
Genius: A poet of unmatched talent in imagery, diction, and aphoristic wisdom.
-
Weakness: Obsessed with wealth and power, dependent on tyrants, and unable to maintain intellectual independence.
The psychological burden of his lineage:
Artistic features of al-Mutanabbi’s poetry (according to Hussein)
-
Hyperbole: He often exaggerated heroic feats—e.g., “If Alexander had thought more wisely, the darkness would have turned into sunlight”—to the point of undermining credibility.
-
Verbal symmetry: His skill in balancing words (e.g., “the sword, the spear, the paper, and the pen”) sometimes overshadowed deeper meaning.
-
Imitation: He imitated Abu Tammam’s poetic structures rather than innovating, contrary to his reputation as a revolutionary stylist.
-
Finest works: Hussein singled out his elegy for Sayf al-Dawla’s sister, Khawla, as among his most moving poems.
Critical messages in Hussein’s book
-
Ethical critique: He accused al-Mutanabbi of turning poetry into a commodity for political gain, abandoning the writer’s duty to resist tyranny.
-
Independent vs. opportunistic intellectuals: Hussein contrasted al-Mutanabbi, who courted power, with Abu al-‘Ala’ al-Ma‘arri, who upheld moral principles—presenting the latter as the true ethical model.
-
Historical parallels: Hussein read the 10th century—a time of political corruption and Qarmatian uprisings—as a mirror of Egypt in the 1930s, with its struggles against colonialism and internal decay.
Memorable quotes from the book
The book’s impact and place in Taha Hussein’s career
-
Dialogue of opposites: The work has been described as a debate between two forces—Taha Hussein as the symbol of intellectual independence, and al-Mutanabbi as the symbol of opportunism—reflecting Hussein’s own refusal to compromise with authority.
-
Critical legacy: It was one of the first works to apply historical-psychological analysis to classical Arabic literature, influencing generations of scholars.
-
Personal transformation: Hussein began the book disliking al-Mutanabbi, but ended with a reluctant admiration for his genius despite his moral flaws.
“The journey began with resistance of the heart and ended with the discovery of why this poet endures: al-Mutanabbi embodied the eternal human struggle between greatness and deceit.”
For the original summary in Arabic
0 تعليقات