"The History of the Arts and Famous Paintings" by Salama Moussa
The Author’s Background
Purpose of the Book
First published in 1927, it was reissued by the Hindawi Foundation in 2011.
Methodology
Theoretical Foundations of the Arts
-
The Nature of Fine ArtsMoussa divides the fine arts into eight categories: music, poetry, prose, architecture, painting, sculpture, dance, and theater. He argues that their shared purpose is the creation of beauty, which he regards as subjective rather than objective:
“The world itself is neither beautiful nor ugly; beauty and ugliness exist only in our minds.”
-
The Hierarchy of the ArtsMoussa arranges the arts along a spectrum between “the intellect” (abstraction) and “the senses” (perception):
-
Closest to the intellect: prose → poetry
-
Middle range: architecture → sculpture → painting
-
Closest to the senses: music
-
The Evolution of ArtInfluenced by Darwin, Moussa links the development of art to broader cultural evolution. He argues that artistic decline results from:
-
A break with innovation
-
Religious or political dominance
-
Excessive traditionalism
A Historical Analysis of European Art
-
Leonardo da Vinci: Unified science and art in works like Mona Lisa.
-
Michelangelo: Expressive sculptures (David) and monumental frescoes (Sistine Chapel ceiling).
-
Raphael: Master of compositional balance (The School of Athens).
B. Modern European Schools
-
The Flemish School (Netherlands): Innovators of oil painting, with a focus on daily realism.
-
Rembrandt: Dramatic use of light (The Night Watch).
-
Vermeer: Intimate domestic scenes (Girl with a Pearl Earring).
-
-
The Spanish School: Distinguished by psychological depth.
-
El Greco: Elongated forms reflecting spiritual struggle.
-
Velázquez: Subtle courtly critiques (Las Meninas).
-
C. Nineteenth-Century Movements
-
Impressionism: Capturing fleeting effects of light (Monet’s Impression, Sunrise).
-
Post-Impressionism:
-
Van Gogh: Swirling lines and fiery colors expressing torment (Starry Night).
-
Gauguin: Tropical palettes and symbolic Tahitian works.
-
-
Avant-garde (Fauvism & Cubism):
-
Picasso: Fragmented forms (Les Demoiselles d’Avignon).
-
Matisse: Bold colors and expressive distortions.
-
Summary Table of Artistic Movements
| Period | School | Key Features | Artists |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15th–16th c. | Italian Renaissance | Anatomical precision, perspective | Da Vinci, Raphael |
| 17th c. | Flemish | Realism, oil technique | Rembrandt, Vermeer |
| 19th c. | Impressionism | Light effects, quick brushwork | Monet, Renoir |
| Early 20th c. | Cubism | Fragmentation, geometry | Picasso, Braque |
Islamic Art through Moussa’s Lens
-
Religious Foundations and InfluenceMoussa argues that Islam’s relative prohibition of figural representation stemmed from the fight against idolatry. Yet he notes greater flexibility in Persia and Fatimid Egypt due to Shi‘i influence.
This prohibition, he suggests, pushed Muslim artists toward:
-
Developing intricate geometric patterns (stars, interlacing designs).
-
Stylizing plant and animal motifs.
-
Elevating Arabic calligraphy into an art form.
-
Major Directions in Islamic Art
-
Geometric Ornamentation: Intersecting circles and triangles creating rhythmic harmony.
-
Arabesque (Tauriq): Abstracted vegetal and animal forms.
-
Calligraphy: Kufic, Thuluth, and Naskh scripts integrated into architecture.
-
Architecture as the PinnacleIslamic architecture merged beauty with function in mosques, markets, and palaces. Key features included:
-
Muqarnas: Stalactite-like ornamentation, perfected under the Mamluks.
-
Mashrabiyas: Latticed wooden screens influenced by Coptic art.
-
Mosaics: Adapted from Byzantine traditions.
Development by Historical Periods
| Era | Geographic Centers | Key Contributions |
|---|---|---|
| Umayyad | Syria, al-Andalus | Dome of the Rock, vegetal motifs |
| Fatimid | Egypt | Palace animal motifs, lustreware ceramics |
| Mamluk | Egypt, Syria | Muqarnas, four-iwan schools |
| Ottoman | Anatolia, Balkans | Monumental domes, red ceramics |
Critique and Debates
-
The Question of “Artistic Decline”Moussa criticizes:
-
Byzantine art for its rigidity in service of the Church.
-
Medieval Europe for artistic stagnation under Catholic dominance.
-
Certain modern schools (e.g., Cubism), which he dismisses as “distortions.”
Critics’ Response: Some accused him of “extreme Darwinism” for applying evolutionary theory to art.
-
The Debate over Islamic Art
-
Moussa’s stance: Islam suppressed representational art, pushing artists toward abstraction.
-
Modern critique: This view underestimates Islamic art’s originality in abstraction and ignores broader cultural exchanges (e.g., with China in ceramics).
-
Limits of Scope
-
Overemphasis on European painting at the expense of sculpture and theater.
-
Neglect of African and non-Islamic Asian art.
-
Insufficient analysis of the images included.
Moussa’s Defense: In his preface, he acknowledged his reliance on Orpen’s framework and deliberately focused on the most famous works.
Legacy and Impact
-
Reception by Readers and CriticsStrengths:
-
The first Arabic book linking art history to cultural context.
-
Accessible introduction to aesthetics for beginners.
Weaknesses:
-
Criticized as “a history of painters, not of art” due to its biographical focus.
-
Strong bias against religious art.
-
Historical Significance
-
Pioneering work, preceding Kamal al-Din Samih’s History of Art by four decades.
-
Offered Arab readers rare exposure to European art trends at a time when translations were scarce.
-
Enduring Lessons
-
Art as a human necessity: for Moussa, art compensates for “the ugliness of the world.”
-
Liberation of art from imitation: “If art were mere imitation, the camera would have surpassed it.”
Conclusion: Between Achievement and Limitation
The History of the Arts and Famous Paintings remains a historical document reflecting the vision of an Arab intellectual attempting to break down Eurocentric art narratives, even as he reproduced some of their assumptions.
While its simplified treatment of artistic schools provided an influential entry point for early Arab readers, its reductive view of Islamic art and limited image analysis reveal the intellectual constraints of its time.
Nonetheless, the work stands as a testament to Salama Moussa’s boldness in engaging with fields that were still considered “foreign” to Arab thought.
For the original summary in Arabic

0 تعليقات